TY - JOUR
T1 - Influence of the surface energy of different brands of polymethyl methacrylate on the adherence of Candida albicans
T2 - An in vitro study
AU - Cabanillas, Betty
AU - Mallma-Medina, Adrián
AU - Petkova-Gueorguieva, Marieta
AU - Alvitez-Temoche, Daniel
AU - Mendoza, Román
AU - Mayta-Tovalino, Frank
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Wolters Kluwer (UK) Ltd.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/1/1
Y1 - 2021/1/1
N2 - Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of the surface energy of different brands of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) on the adherence of Candida albicans ATCC 10231 in an in vitro study. Materials and Methods: The study had an in vitro, longitudinal, and comparative experimental design. The following groups were made: (1) Vitacryl versus controls (water, dimethyl sulfoxide, glycerol, diethylene glycol, and formamide); (2) Triplex versus the same controls; (3) Vitacryl versus Triplex (surface energy); and (4) Vitacryl versus Triplex (adhesion per cell/field). Adhesion was measured in the area of each field magnified 10 × 10, and with an increase in magnification to 40 × 10, very dense colonies of 0.152 mm2were observed. Results: The surface energy of Vitacryl and Triplex was 40.3 ± 0.3 and 39.5 ± 0.3N/m, respectively, showing statistically significant differences (P 0.001). On the contrary, in relation to the adhesion per cell/field of C. albicans, Vitacryl presented 15.7 ± 1.1, whereas Triplex had 16.7 ± 2.3, with no significant differences (P = 0.058). Conclusion: In relation to the adhesion per cell/field of C. albicans, there was no evidence of significant differences between Vitacryl and Triplex.
AB - Objective: The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of the surface energy of different brands of polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) on the adherence of Candida albicans ATCC 10231 in an in vitro study. Materials and Methods: The study had an in vitro, longitudinal, and comparative experimental design. The following groups were made: (1) Vitacryl versus controls (water, dimethyl sulfoxide, glycerol, diethylene glycol, and formamide); (2) Triplex versus the same controls; (3) Vitacryl versus Triplex (surface energy); and (4) Vitacryl versus Triplex (adhesion per cell/field). Adhesion was measured in the area of each field magnified 10 × 10, and with an increase in magnification to 40 × 10, very dense colonies of 0.152 mm2were observed. Results: The surface energy of Vitacryl and Triplex was 40.3 ± 0.3 and 39.5 ± 0.3N/m, respectively, showing statistically significant differences (P 0.001). On the contrary, in relation to the adhesion per cell/field of C. albicans, Vitacryl presented 15.7 ± 1.1, whereas Triplex had 16.7 ± 2.3, with no significant differences (P = 0.058). Conclusion: In relation to the adhesion per cell/field of C. albicans, there was no evidence of significant differences between Vitacryl and Triplex.
KW - Adherence
KW - Candida albicans
KW - polymethyl methacrylate
KW - surface energy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100415612&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD-291-20
DO - 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD-291-20
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85100415612
SN - 2231-0762
VL - 11
SP - 6
EP - 12
JO - Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry
JF - Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry
IS - 1
ER -