TY - JOUR
T1 - A comparative evaluation of endodontically treated root canals obturated using gutta-percha with two different protocols
T2 - An in-vitro study
AU - Munive-Degregori, Arnaldo
AU - Mayta-Tovalino, Frank
AU - Lúcar-Flores, Cecilia
AU - Mendoza, Roman
AU - Alvitez-Temoche, Daniel
AU - Guillen-Galarza, Carlos
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Wolters Kluwer (UK) Ltd.. All rights reserved.
PY - 2021/11/1
Y1 - 2021/11/1
N2 - Objective: The aim of this article is to evaluate the quality of filling in endodontically treated root canals using the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two single-rooted teeth were divided into two groups that were assigned by simple randomization according to the filling technique. Once the endodontic treatment was performed, a periapical radiograph was taken to assess the quality according to the radiographic density and tomography was taken to evaluate the quality according to the tomographic volume of spaces, compared with the post-preparation biomechanical tomography. Finally, we performed a statistical analysis (Student's t-test) to evaluate whether there were differences between the types of filling. Results: Radiographic radiodensity was 182.89 ± 9.81 and 186.72 ± 6.97 HU for teeth treated with the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique, respectively. The void volume was 3.75 ± 2.35 and 2.43 ± 1.18 mm 3 for teeth treated with the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique, respectively. Conclusion: No significant differences were found between the techniques for both filling quality parameters.
AB - Objective: The aim of this article is to evaluate the quality of filling in endodontically treated root canals using the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique. Materials and Methods: Thirty-two single-rooted teeth were divided into two groups that were assigned by simple randomization according to the filling technique. Once the endodontic treatment was performed, a periapical radiograph was taken to assess the quality according to the radiographic density and tomography was taken to evaluate the quality according to the tomographic volume of spaces, compared with the post-preparation biomechanical tomography. Finally, we performed a statistical analysis (Student's t-test) to evaluate whether there were differences between the types of filling. Results: Radiographic radiodensity was 182.89 ± 9.81 and 186.72 ± 6.97 HU for teeth treated with the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique, respectively. The void volume was 3.75 ± 2.35 and 2.43 ± 1.18 mm 3 for teeth treated with the lateral condensation technique and modified lateral condensation technique, respectively. Conclusion: No significant differences were found between the techniques for both filling quality parameters.
KW - Endodontics
KW - filling techniques
KW - in-vitro study
KW - lateral condensation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120954437&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_113_21
DO - 10.4103/jispcd.JISPCD_113_21
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85120954437
SN - 2231-0762
VL - 11
SP - 678
EP - 684
JO - Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry
JF - Journal of International Society of Preventive and Community Dentistry
IS - 6
ER -