Rating mean of expert judges and asymmetric confidence intervals in content validity: An SPSS syntax

César Merino-Soto, José Livia-Segovia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

The estimation of content validity, obtained by rational analysis of expert judges, is usually done with coefficients that standardize between 0.0 and 1.0 the judges' judgment. However, this estimate can also be ex-pressed in the metric of the judges' responses, in the form of the response mean, and with asymmetric confidence intervals around this mean. The aim of the present manuscript is to implement a procedure for these esti-mates (response mean and asymmetric confidence intervals) in a program written in SPSS syntax. The rationale of the procedure is explained, and an applied example of the calculation is developed. The program is freely dis-tributed upon request to the authors.

Translated title of the contributionCalificación promedio de jueces expertos e intervalos de confianza asimétricos en la validez de contenido: Una sintaxis SPSS
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)395-398
Number of pages4
JournalAnales de Psicologia
Volume38
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 1 May 2022

Keywords

  • Content validity
  • Software
  • Statistics
  • Subject matter experts
  • Validity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rating mean of expert judges and asymmetric confidence intervals in content validity: An SPSS syntax'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this